Here is a straightforward inquiry with a conceivably confounding arrangement of answers: Do you realize which tests in your lab are as of now being tried and where each example is in the testing interaction? If you direct complex example testing, odds are you do not have the foggiest idea. Test following is frequently a precarious difficult exercise, in which you assume the double parts of traffic cop and researcher. Frequently a similar individual (you) arranges research facility tasks and test the board and really tests the examples. Staying up with the latest—like those chaotic Excel or Google Sheets documents—is almost outlandish.
In case you are not utilizing a Lab Information System (LIS) as a mechanized example following programming, it tends to be a colossal test to keep an idea about your examples. Test following winds up diverting you and causing issues. Think about the conditions and intricacies of the present example testing:
A single example may require days to test, with numerous individuals handling each example
A complete testing interaction may incorporate up to twelve complex cycles and methods for some random example
Multiple clumps of tests are usually tried in a lab out of the blue
sample uprightness and information quality are in question if an example is not handled inside a suitable time.
Sample sheets (likely an Excel report) are normally outdated compelling you and your group to incline toward a conflicting hotspot for test following your memory
How a LIS Remedies Your Sample Tracking Headaches
Carrying out a LIS programming answer for your example following cycles resembles labeling each example with a dependable GPS. That is the motivation behind LIS test the executive’s programming—to decisively follow tests and deal with all the data about them that you need to know. However, what would it be advisable for you to search for in LIS abilities?
As a matter of first importance, a LIS ought to reveal to you where every example is rapidly and effectively in your testing interaction. The way to knowing the whereabouts of every one of your examples is a basic line-based global positioning framework. In this framework, the LIS puts each example on an alternate example line proper to its position in the testing cycle. This tells you precisely where each example is in your interaction, across lines.
Without this organized organization for test following, an example may sit either untested or mostly tried—forgotten until you end up discovering it again and make sure to test it. Line-based example following forestalls this, assisting any lab with wiping out the opportunity of tests escaping everyone’s notice.
What is Queue-Based Sample Tracking?
To see how to line-based example global positioning frameworks can help your lab, it is valuable to realize how test lines work.
Each example has both an exceptional recognizable following number and a status. The following number discloses to your which test is which—significant because all cylinders and plates appear to be identical. The status is a basic, generally clear term that makes it simple for anybody to rapidly know where the example is simultaneous. A few instances of status terms: “Delivered for Testing,” “In Sequencing,” “Testing Complete,” or “Re-Testing Needed.”
Your LIS gives an individual line to each critical advance in your example testing measure. Tests are recorded on a fitting line dependent on their status. As you complete one segment of the testing and are prepared to continue to the following, the LIS naturally refreshes the situation with each significant example. For example, the status may change from “In Sequencing” to “Testing Complete.”
You can likewise show extra examples following information in the line, for example, test receipt dates, to assist you with focusing on which tests to test first. For instance, you can rapidly see which tests are most seasoned and maybe a higher need to handle first.
There are essential safeguard works each line-based example global positioning framework ought to have. In the first place, the framework ought not to permit anybody to enter an example into the LIS without relegating it to a status. On the off chance that each example has a status, no example will at any point be lost. Second, as testing proceeds, each example stays in a line until its testing is finished. At last, the LIS ought to consequently refresh the situation with the examples in each line. This is a basic advance in forestalling blunders that surface when clients are compelled to physically change test status.
With these underlying capacities to assist with the following examples, the times of stressing over neglected examples are finished.
Outline: Benefits of Queue-Based Sample Tracking
Here is a speedy recap of the benefits of utilizing a LIMS that utilizes a line-based way to deal with test tracks—and why it is an absolute necessity have for your lab:
Precision: A LIS that naturally refreshes test status will convey essentially more exact situations with your cycles. If you depend on manual information passage to keep the situation with each example refreshed, blunders will reliably happen. Somebody in your group will ultimately refresh some unacceptable examples or simply neglect to refresh an example status.
Accuracy: With line-based example following, no example will at any point stay disregarded and untested or be failed to remember partially through testing. Any LIS or test following programming not utilizing line-based example following will have tests that are not tried on schedule—or by any means.
Effectiveness: Everyone in the lab can rapidly distinguish which tests should be prepared and the subsequent stages for any example being tried. You will save time for your lab chiefs, administrators, and professionals, and can commit fewer full-time staff hours to playtest the board traffic cop. Speed: Sample turnaround time can improve, with no disarray regarding which tests need which kind of preparing, and when. A computerized test following technique keeps you on target, on schedule, and ceaselessly useful.
